The role of liquidity in asset pricing: the special case of the Portuguese Stock Market
Keywords:
Portugal, Stock liquidity, Asset pricing, CommonalityAbstract
Purpose. The aim of this paper is to examine the role of liquidity in asset pricing in a tiny market, such as the Portuguese. The unique setting of the Lisbon Stock Exchange with regards to changes in classification from an emerging to a developed stock market, allows an original answer to whether changes in the development of the market affect the role of liquidity in asset pricing.
Design/methodology/approach. The authors propose and compare two alternative implications of liquidity in asset pricing: as a desirable characteristic of stocks and as a source of systematic risk. In contrast to prior research for major stock markets, they use the proportion of zero returns which is an appropriated measure of liquidity in tiny markets and propose the separated effects of illiquidity in a capital asset pricing model framework over the whole sample period as well as in two sub-samples, depending on the change in classification of the Portuguese market, from an emerging to a developed one.
Findings. The overall results of the study show that individual illiquidity affects Portuguese stock returns. However, in contrast to previous evidence from other markets, they show that the most traded stocks (hence the most liquid stocks) exhibit larger returns. In addition, they show that the illiquidity effects on stock returns were higher and more significant in the period from January 1988 to November 1997, during which the Portuguese stock market was still an emerging market.
Research limitations/implications. These findings are relevant for investors when they make their investment decisions and for market regulators because they reflect the need of improving the competitiveness of the Portuguese stock market. Additionally, these findings are a challenge for academics because they exhibit the need for providing alternative theories for tiny markets such as the Portuguese one.
Practical implications. The results have important implications for individual and institutional investors who can take into account the peculiar effect of liquidity in stock returns to make proper investment decision.
Originality/value. The Portuguese market provides a natural experimental area to analyse the role of liquidity in asset pricing, because it is a tiny market and during the period studied it changed from an emerging to a developed exclusively focuses on the US and major European stock markets, whereas studies for the Portuguese one are scarce. In this context, the study provides an alternative methodological approach with results that differ from those theoretically expected. Thus, these findings are a challenge for academics and open a theoretical and a practical debatestock market. Moreover, the authors have to highlight that previous evidence almost.
Downloads
References
Acharya, V.V. and Pedersen, L.H. (2005), “Asset pricing with liquidity risk”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 77 No. 2, pp. 375-410.
Amihud, Y. (2002), “Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects”, Journal of Financial Markets, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 31-56.
Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H. (1986), “Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 223-249.
Baillie, R.T. and DeGennaro, R.P. (1990), “Stock returns and volatility”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 203-214.
Balvers, R.J. and Huang, D. (2007), “Productivity-based asset pricing: theory and evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 405-445.
Balvers, R.J. and Huang, D. (2009), “Money and the C-CAPM”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 337-368.
Balvers, R.J., Gu, L. and Huang, D. (2017), “Profitability, value and stock returns in production-based asset pricing without frictions”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 49 No. 7, pp. 1621-1651.
Balvers, R.J., Hu, O. and Huang, D. (2012), “Transitory market states and the joint occurrence of momentum and mean reversion”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 471-495.
Bekaert, G., Harvey, C.R. and Lundblad, C. (2007), “Liquidity and expected returns: lessons from emerging markets”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 1783-1831.
Bollerslev, T. and Zhou, H. (2006), “Volatility puzzles: a simple framework for gauging return-volatility regressions”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 131 Nos 1/2, pp. 123-150.
Brennan, M.J. and Subrahmanyam, A. (1996), “Market microstructure and asset pricing: on the compensation for illiquidity in stock returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 441-464.
Butt, H.A. (2015), “A comparison among various dimensions of illiquidity effect: a case study of Finland”, Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 33 (January), pp. 204-220.
Butt, H.A. and Virk, N.S. (2015), “Liquidity and asset prices: an empirical investigation of the Nordic stock markets”, European Financial Management, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 672-705.
Campbell, J.Y. and Hentschel, L. (1992), “No news is good news: an asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 281-318.
Chordia, T., Roll, R. and Subrahmanyam, A. (2000), “Commonality in liquidity”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 3-28.
Datar, V.T., Naik, N.Y. and Radcliffe, R. (1998), “Liquidity and stock returns: an alternative test”, Journal of Financial Markets, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 203-219.
Eleswarapu, V.R. and Reinganum, M.R. (1993), “The seasonal behavior of the liquidity premium in asset pricing”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 373-386.
Escalda, A. (1993), Risco e liquidez - Uma análise do mercado accionista Português, Master Thesis, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, Lisboa.
Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1993), “Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 3-56.
Fama, E.F. and Macbeth, J.D. (1973), “Risk, return, and equilibrium - empirical tests”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81 No. 3, pp. 607-636.
French, K.R., Schwert, G.W. and Stambaugh, R.F. (1987), “Expected stock returns and volatility”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 3-29.
Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D.E. (1993), “On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48 No. 5, pp. 1779-1801.
Goyenko, R.Y., Holden, C.W. and Trzcinka, C.A. (2009), “Do liquidity measures measure liquidity?”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 92 No. 2, pp. 153-181.
Harrison, P. and Zhang, H.H. (1999), “An investigation of the risk and return relation at long horizons”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 81 No. 3, pp. 399-408.
Hasbrouck, J. and Seppi, D.J. (2001), “Common factors in prices, order flows, and liquidity”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 59 No. 3, pp. 383-411.
Huberman, G. and Halka, D. (2001), “Systematic liquidity”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 161-178.
Lee, K.H. (2011), “The world price of liquidity risk”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 99 No. 1, pp. 136-161.
Lesmond, D.A., Ogden, J.P. and Trzcinka, C.A. (1999), “A new estimate of transaction costs”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 1113-1141.
Lewellen, J., Nagel, S. and Shanken, J. (2010), “A skeptical appraisal of asset pricing tests”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 96 No. 2, pp. 175-194.
Li, B., Sun, Q. and Wang, C. (2014), “Liquidity, liquidity risk and stock returns: evidence from Japan”, European Financial Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 126-151.
Lintner, J. (1965), “The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stocks portfolios and capital budgets”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 13-37.
Lo, A.W. and MacKinlay, A.C. (1990), “Data-snooping biases in tests of financial asset pricing models”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 431-467.
López, G., Marhuenda, J. and Nieto, B. (2009), “The relationship between risk and expected returns with incomplete information”, Investigaciones Económicas, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 69-96.
Mello, A.S. and Escalda, A. (1994), “Is there a size effect or a liquidity premium in Portuguese stocks?”, Quarterly Bulletin of the Central Bank of Portugal, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 55-64.
Miralles-Marcelo, J.L. and Miralles-Quirós, M.M. (2006), “The role of an illiquidity risk factor in asset pricing: empirical evidence from the Spanish stock market”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 254-267.
Miralles-Marcelo, J.L., Miralles-Quirós, M.M. and Miralles-Quirós, J.L. (2013), “Estructura financiera de la empresa y valoración de activos en el mercado bursátil español”, The Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol. 42 No. 160, pp. 561-589.
Miralles-Marcelo, J.L., Miralles Quirós, M.M. and Oliveira, C. (2015), “Systematic liquidity: commonality and inter-temporal variation in the Portuguese stock market”, Cuadernos De Gestión, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 39-64.
Mossin, J. (1966), “Equilibrium in a capital asset market”, Econometrica, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 768-783.
Nguyen, N.H. and Lo, K.H. (2013), “Asset returns and liquidity effects: evidence from a developed but small market”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 1175-1190.
Nielsson, U. (2009), “Stock exchange merger and liquidity: the case of Euronext”, Journal of Financial Markets, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 229-267.
Pagano, M. and Padilla, A. (2005), “Gains from stock exchange integration: the Euronext evidence”, in Research, C.F.E.P. (Ed.), Centre for Economic Policy Research Working Paper.
Papavassiliou, V.G. (2013), “A new method for estimating liquidity risk: insights from a liquidity-adjusted CAPM framework”, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 24 (April), pp. 184-197.
Pástor, L. and Stambaugh, R.F. (2003), “Liquidity risk and expected stock retums”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 111 No. 3, pp. 642-685.
Pereira, J.P. and Cutelo, T. (2013), “Tiny prices in a tiny market: evidence from Portugal on optimal share prices”, European Financial Management, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 579-598.
Sharpe, W.F. (1964), “Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 425-442.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
