The use of the recognition heuristic as an investment strategy in European stock markets
Keywords:Investment decisions, Behavioural finance, Stock returns, Financial market, Recognition heuristic
Purpose. People often face constraints such as a lack of time or information in taking decisions, which leads them to use heuristics. In these situations, fast and frugal rules may be useful for making adaptive decisions with fewer resources, even if it leads to suboptimal choices. When applied to financial markets, the recognition heuristic predicts that investors acquire the stocks that they are aware of, thereby inflating the price of the most recognized stocks. This paper aims to study the profitability against the market of the most recognized stocks in Europe.
Design/methodology/approach. In this paper, the authors perform a survey and use Google Trends to study the profitability against the market of the most recognized stocks in Europe.
Findings. The authors conclude that a recognition heuristic portfolio yields poorer returns than a market portfolio. In contrast, from the data collected on Google Trends, weak evidence was found that strong increases in companies monthly search volumes may lead to abnormal returns in the following month.
Research limitations/implications. The applied investment strategy does not account for transaction costs, which may jeopardize its profitability given the fact that it is necessary to revise the portfolio on a monthly basis. Despite the results obtained, they are useful to understanding the performance of recognition heuristic strategies over a comprehensive time horizon, and it would be interesting to depict its viability during different market conditions. This analysis could provide additional information about a preferable scenario for employing our strategies and, ultimately, enhance the profitability of recognition heuristic strategies.
Practical implications. Through the exhaustive analysis performed here on the recognition heuristic in the European stock market, it is possible to conclude that no evidence was found for the viability of exploring this type of strategy. In fact, the investors would always gain better returns when adopting a passive investment strategy. Therefore, it would be wise to assume that the European market presents at least a degree of efficiency where no investment would yield abnormal returns following the recognition heuristic.
Originality/value. The main objective of this paper is to study the performance of the recognition heuristic in the financial markets and to contribute to the knowledge in this field. Although many authors have already studied this heuristic when applied to financial markets, there is a lack of consensus in the literature.
Akerlof, G.A. and Shiller, R.J. (2010), Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Andersson, P. and Rakow, T. (2007), “Now you see it now you don’t: the effectiveness of the recognition heuristic for selecting stocks”, Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 2, pp. 29-39.
Bank, M., Larch, M. and Peter, G. (2011), “Google search volume and its influence on liquidity and returns of German stocks”, Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 239-264.
Barber, B.M. and Odean, T. (2008), “All that glitters: the effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 785-818.
Borges, B., Goldstein, D.G., Ortmann, A. and Gigerenzer, G. (1999), “Can ignorance beat the stock market?”, in Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. and The ABC Research Group (Eds), Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, Oxford, pp. 59-72.
Boyd, M. (2001), “On ignorance, intuition, and investing: a bear market test of the recognition heuristic”, Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 150-156.
Buzzell, R.D., Gale, B.T. and Sultan, R.G. (1975), “Market share – a key to profitability”, Harvard Business Review, pp. 97-106.
Carhart, M.M. (1997), “On persistence in mutual fund performance”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 57-82.
Da, Z.H.I., Engelberg, J. and Gao, P. (2011), “In search of attention”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 66 No. 5, pp. 1461-1499.
Engelberg, J. and Parsons, C. (2011), “The causal impact of media in financial markets”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 67-97.
Fama, E.F. (1970), “Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 383-417.
Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1993), “Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 3-56.
Fang, L. and Peress, J. (2009), “Media coverage and the cross-section of stock returns”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 64 No. 5, pp. 2023-2052.
Gigerenzer, G. and Goldstein, D.G. (1996), “Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality”, Psychological Review, Vol. 103 No. 4, pp. 650-669.
Goldstein, D.G. and Gigerenzer, G. (1999), “The recognition heuristic: how ignorance makes us smart”, in Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. and The ABC Research Group (Eds), Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, Oxford, pp. 37-58.
Goldstein, D.G. and Gigerenzer, G. (2002), “Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic”, Psychological Review, Vol. 109 No. 4, pp. 75-90.
Griggs, R.A. and Cox, J.R. (1982), “The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason’s selection task”, British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 73 No. 3, pp. 407-420.
Hillert, A., Jacobs, H. and Muller, S. (2014), “Media makes momentum”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 27 No. 12, pp. 3467-3501.
Jensen, M.C. (1968), “The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 389-416.
Katsikopoulos, K.V. and Martignon, L. (2006), “Naïve heuristics for paired comparisons: some results on their relative accuracy”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 488-494.
Lintner, J. (1965), “The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 13-37.
Lou, D. (2014), “Attracting investor attention through advertising”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 1797-1829.
Merton, R.C. (1987), “A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 483-510.
Mossin, J. (1966), “Equilibrium in a capital asset market”, Econometrica, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 768-783.
Pachur, T., Todd, P.M., Gigerenzer, G., Schooler, L.J. and Goldstein, D.G. (2011), “The recognition heuristic: a review of theory and tests”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 1-14.
Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J. (1993), The Adaptive Decision Maker, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ramanujam, V. and Venkatraman, N. (1984), “An inventory and critique of strategy research using the PIMS database”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 138-151.
Sharpe, W.F. (1964), “Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 425-442.
Tetlock, P. (2007), “Giving content to investor sentiment: the role of media in the stock market”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 1139-1168.
Tetlock, P. (2011), “All the news that’s fit to reprint: do investors react to stale information?”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 1481-1512.
Treynor, J. (1961), “Market value, time, and risk”, unpublished manuscript.
Treynor, J. (1962), “Toward a theory of market value of risky assets”, unpublished manuscript.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974), “Judgment under uncertainty – heuristics and biases”, Science, Vol. 185 No. 4157, pp. 1124-1131.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.