Pricing maximum-minimum bidirectional options in trinomial CEV model

Authors

  • Bin Peng SEME, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, P. R. China
  • Fei Peng Electrical & Computer Engineering, UBC, Vancouver, Canada

Keywords:

Trinomial CEV model, Recursive algorithm, Maximum-minimum bidirectional options

Abstract

Maximum-minimum bidirectional options are a kind of exotic path dependent options. In the constant elasticity of variance (CEV) model, a combining trinomial tree was structured to approximate the nonconstant volatility that is a function of the underlying asset. On this basis, a simple and efficient recursive algorithmwas developed to compute the risk-neutral probability of each different node for the underlying asset reaching a maximum or minimum price and the total number of maxima (minima) in the trinomial tree. With help of it, the computational problems can be effectively solved arising from the inherent complexities of different types of maximum-minimum bidirectional options when the underlying asset evolves as the trinomial CEV model. Numerical results demonstrate the validity and the convergence of the approach mentioned above for the different parameter values set in the trinomial CEV model.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jefas.2016.06.001

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beckers, S. (1980). The consant elasticity of variance model and its implications for option pricing. Journal of Finance, (35), 661–673.

Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of option and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, (81), 637–659.

Boyle, P., & Tian, Y. (1999). Pricing lookback and barrier options under the CEV process. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 34(2), 242–264.

Bin, P., & Fei, P. (2006). Pricing geometric Asian option t under the CEV process. International Economic Journal, (4), 515–519.

Cox, J. (1996). Notes on option pricing 1: Constant elasticity of variance diffusions. Unpublished draft. Palo Alto, CA. Stanford University (September 1975). Published in the Journal of Portfolio Management, (23), 5–17.

Cox, J. C., & Ross, S. A. (1976). The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics, (7), 145–166.

Davil, C. (1982). Further results on the constant elasticity of variance call option pricing model. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, (4), 533–554.

Duvydov, D., & Linetsky, V. (2001). Pricing and hedging path-dependent options under the CEV process. Management Science, (47), 949–965.

He, X. (2001). Pricing lookback option under CEV process. Journal of Systems Engineering, (4), 296–300.

Macbeth, J. D., & Merville, L. J. (1980). Tests of the Black-Scholes and Cox call optionvaluation models. Journal of Finance, (35), 285–301

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Peng, B. ., & Peng, F. . (2016). Pricing maximum-minimum bidirectional options in trinomial CEV model. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 21(41), 50–55. Retrieved from https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/137