Perú: políticas para cerrar la brecha de la balanza de conocimientos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46631/jefas.2011.v16n30.04Keywords:
Economic development, technological change, industrialization, natural resources, industrial policy, international economics, trade policy, comparative studies of countries, productive specializationAbstract
In this paper we show the balance of knowledge deficit in Peru compared to the surplus of its trade balance and the necessity to transform the structure and technological coefficients of exports to close this knowledge gap. We analyze major economic policies that could help in closing the gap, especially industrial and technological innovation policies, rethinking intellectual property rights and impelling the forces that propagate the economic system as a whole. “Openness” and the “good management of macroeconomic fundamentals” are necessary but not sufficient conditions to transform the economy, which for better performance need the strategic “will and wit” of adding value and a better balance between external and national interests.
Downloads
References
Balassa, B.: Bueno, G. M.; Kuczyinski, P. P. & Simonsen, M. H. (1986): Toward Renewed Economic Growth in
Latin América, Institute for International Economics, Washington D. C.
Bush, V. (1957). Some Proposals for Improving the Patent System. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office
Society, 39(1).
Cassiolato, J. E., & Vitorino, V. (2009). BRICS and Development Alternatives: Innovation Systems and
Policies. London and New York: Anthem Press.
Chang, H (1993). The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Korea”, Cambridge Journal of Economics,
(2), 131-157.
Chang, H. (2002). Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem
Press.
Ernst, D. (1998). Catching Up, Crisis and Industrial Upgrading: Evolutionary Aspects of Technological
Learning in Korea´s Electronic Industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15(2), 247-283.
Fujii G., Candaudap, E., & Gaona, C. (2005). Exportaciones, Industria Maquiladora y Crecimiento Económico
en México a partir de la década de los Noventa. Investigación Económica, 254, 125-156.
Kuramoto, J., & Torero, M. (2009). Public-private research, development, and innovation in Peru. En M. Graham
& J. Woo Fueling Economic Growth: the Role of Public-Private Sector Research in Development.
Ottawa, Canadá: IDRC,.
Jiménez, F. (2000). Liberalización, Reestructuración Productiva y Competitividad en la Industria Peruana
de los Años 90 (Documento de Trabajo, no. 183).
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Departamento de Economía. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and The Japonese Miracle.
Stanford, MA: Stanford University Press.
Lall, S. (2000). The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured
Exports, 1985–98. Oxford Development Studies,28(3), 337-369.
Machlup, F., & Penrose, E. (1950). The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century. Journal of Economic
History, 10(1), 1-29.
Magaziner, I., & Hout, T. (1980). Japonese Industrial Policy. London: Policy Studies Institute.
OECD (2009). Base de Datos STAN Indicators. Recuperado de http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx.
Penrose, E (1951). The Economics of the International Patent System. Baltimore: John Hopkins University
Press.
Pérez, C. (2010). Dinamismo Tecnológico e Inclusión Social en América Latina: Una estrategia de Desarrollo productivo Basado en Recursos Naturales.
Revista de la CEPAL, 100, 123-145.
Reinert, E. (2004). The Other Canon: the History of Renaissance Economics. En E. Reinert (Ed) Globalization,
Economic Development and Inequality: An Alternative Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Reinert, E. (2007). How Rich Countries Got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. London: Editorial
Constable.
Roca, S. (Ed) (2007). Propiedad Intelectual y Comercio en el Perú: Impacto y Agenda Pendiente. Lima, Perú:
ESAN Ediciones.
Roca, S. (2011). La Balanza de Conocimientos del Perú. En Perú al 2021, Retos y Perspectivas para el Empresario: Un análisis multidisciplinario. Buenos Aires,
Argentina: CENGAGE Learning.
Roca, S. & Simabuko, L. (1998). Primarización y Nivel de Vida: El Caso Peruano 1950-1997 (Documentos de
Trabajo No 8). Universidad ESAN, ESAN Ediciones.
Roca, S., & Simabuko, L. (2003). Little Value Creation, Articulation and Propagation Forces in The
Mexican Economy. Paper presentado en la Segunda Conferencia Globelics, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Roca, S., & Simabuko, L. (2004). Natural resources, industrialization and fluctuating standards of living in Peru,
-97: a case of activity-specific economic growth.
En E. Reinert Globalization, Economic Development and Inequality. An Alternative Perspective. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rodrik, D. (2005). Políticas de Diversificación Económica. Revista de la CEPAL 87(diciembre), 7-23.
Thompsom, G. (1989). Industrial Policy: USA and UK Debates. London: Routledge.
Van Zanden, L. (2009). The Long Road to the IndustrialRevolution: The European Economy in a Global
Perspective, 1000-1800. Leiden, The Netherlands Koninklijke Brill.
Williamson, J. (1989). What Washington D. C Means by Policy Reform. In Latin American Adjustment: How
Much Has Happened?. Washington, D. C.: Institute of International Economics.
World Bank. (1993). The East Asian Miracle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Pres
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
