Agency costs and the size discount: evidence from acquisitions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46631/jefas.2010.v15n29.05Keywords:
Agency costs, size discount, acquisitions, corporate governanceAbstract
Many scholars have found a negative relationship between a firm’s size and its value, as measured by Tobin’s q. This result is called the size discount. There are hypotheses about why the size discount exists, but none have been rigorously empirically tested. This paper argues that the size discount is created by the inability of shareholders to minimize agency costs in larger companies. Statistical tests suggest that the size discount only appears in large firms with managers that impose excessive agency costs upon their shareholders. Empiricists who use Tobin’s q to proxy for growth opportunities may need a different proxy.
Downloads
References
Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between
managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377-397.
Antoniou, A., Petmezas, D., & Zhao, H. (2007). Bidder gains and losses of firms involved in many acquisitions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,
(7&8), 1221–1244.
Baker G., & Kennedy, R. (2002). Survivorship and the economic grim reaper. Journal of Law, Economics &
Organizations, 18(2), 324-361.
Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1996). Bustup takeovers of valuedestroying diversified firms. Journal of Finance,
(4), 1175-1200.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. The
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 901-932.
Bizjak, J., & Marquette, C. (1998). Are shareholder proposals all bark and no bite? Evidence from shareholder resolutions to rescind poison pills. Journal of
Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33(4), 499- 521.
Bradley, M., Desai, A., & Kim, E. (1988). Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division
between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1), 3-40.
Cho, M. H. (1998).Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis. Journal
of Financial Economics, 47(1), 103-121.
Claessens, S, Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of
Finance, 57(6), 2741-2771.
Cockburn, I., & Griliches, Z. (1988). Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents. American Economic
Review, 78(2), 419-423.
Coles, J. L., Lemmon, M. L., & Meschke, J. F. (2007). Structural models and endogeneity in corporate finance: the link between managerial ownership and
corporate performance. (Working Paper). Arizona State University.
Daines, R. (2001). Does Delaware Law improve firm Value? Journal of Financial Economics, 62(3), 525-558.
Demsetz, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics,
(2), 375-390.
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Ownership structure and top executive turnover. Journal of
Financial Economics, 45(2), 193-222.
Denis, D. K., & McConnell, J. J. (2003). International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1-36.
Fuller, K., Netter, J., & Stegemoller, M. (2002). What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from
firms that make many acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1763-1793.
Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of
Economics, 118(1), 107-155.
Hall, M., & Weiss, L. (1967). Firm size and profitability. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49(3), 319-331.
Harford, J. (1999). Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 54(6), 1969-97.
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20(4), 101-112.
Hillegeist, S. A., Keating, E. K., Cram, D. P., & Lundstedt, K. G. (2004). Assessing the probability of bankruptcy. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(1), 5-34.
Himmelberg, C. P., Hubbard, R. G., & Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership
and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), 353–84.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
