An introduction to pensionomics
Keywords:
Econographicology, Multi-dimensional geometry, Multi-dimensional graphs, Pension systemsAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of pensionomics as a prospective tool for pension evaluation. This paper suggests a paradigm shift – a multi-disciplinary synthesis of differing perspectives in evaluating pension’s overall performance based on past work on pension evaluation – incorporating non-economic variables with significant impact on economic growth and social development.
Design/methodology/approach: This paper suggests a new analytical tool called “Pensions Consistency (PC) Index” that identifies the level of consistency and the strengths and weaknesses within any pension system. The new conceptual framework focusses on building inter-sectoral and holistic policies able to respond to the new multi-dimensional dynamic environment.
Findings: The consideration of pensionomics concept as an evaluation tool for pension schemes provides insights that are helpful in explaining performance differentials. Taking definition, classification and evaluation as a guiding principle, the new conceptual framework can be a useful point of reference for the overall evaluation of pension schemes, revealing deficiencies that traditional evaluation methods cannot detect. The multi-disciplinary approach focusses on building inter-sectoral and holistic policies that are able to respond to the multi-dimensional uncertainties of the new dynamic environment.
Research limitations/implications: The heterogeneity and complexity in event dynamics are systemic in the sense that the impact is far from linear. The idiosyncratic nature of unexpected and unpredictable events is rather a result of multi-dimensionality based, among others, on magnitude, frequency, timing, intensity and impact. It is plausible to argue that crisis episodes can destabilize critical systems of economic activity, producing economic spillovers that can directly or indirectly affect the sustainability of pension schemes. If the calculation of direct economic impact is readily traceable, the estimation of indirect economic impact can be an onerous task.
Practical implications: Pensionomics places the concept of retirement in a multi-disciplinary context. Pensionomics overcomes theoretical and empirical limitations encountered by the path-dependency perspective, developing a new research agenda to study pension schemes under historical, cultural, social, political, economic, political and environmental prism. Integrating diversified data, techniques, perspectives and concepts, pensionomics’ objective is to connect natural and man-made events with social protection mechanisms for the development of a dynamic social protection framework where individual, community and society needs are met effectively and efficiently by implementing tailored policies, closely related to their specific context.
Social implications: The concept of retirement has evolved constantly, transforming societies and shaping both income and non-income dimensions of well-being. Pension entitlement turned gradually from a political discourse to a human right discourse. Pension schemes have extended the scope of insurance coverage beyond labour markets and the lifecycle, supporting the broader needs of entire population. Furthermore, pension schemes are widely acknowledged as drivers of economic growth: they enhance labour productivity; foster smooth consumption; and create a stable economic environment for investment and innovation. Current expectations require pension schemes to adopt proactive and reactive policies to examine options for mitigation or for modification of potential consequences in anticipation of exceptional events.
Originality/value: This paper suggests a paradigm shift, a multi-disciplinary approach called pensionomics, and this “multi-disciplinary” focus builds a new analytical framework to evaluate pension’s overall performance based on past work on pension evaluation, incorporating non-economic variables with significant impact on economic growth and social development. PC-Index introduces a comprehensive evaluation tool to study the coverage, performance, efficiency, effectiveness, current trends and future possibilities of pension schemes.
Downloads
References
Aaron, H.J. and Reischauer, R.D. (1998), Countdown to Reform: The Great Social Security Debate, The Century Foundation Press, New York, NY.
Alonzo, A., Hoyo, C. and Tuesta, D. (2015), “A model for the pension system in Mexico: diagnosis and recommendations”, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 76-112.
Biggs, A.G. and Springstead, G.R. (2008), “Alternative measures of replacement rates for social security benefits and retirement income”, Social Security Bulletin, Vol. 68 No. 2, pp. 1-19.
Blondell, S. and Scarpetta, S. (1999), “The retirement decision in OECD counties”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 202, OECD, Paris.
Borella, M. and Fornero, E. (2009), “Adequacy of pension systems in Europe: an analysis based on comprehensive replacement rates”, ENERGI Research Report No. 68 European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2033652
Boskin, J.M. and Hurd, D.M. (1978), “The effect of social security on early retirement”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 361-377.
Cambridge University Press (2017), “Journal of economics and finance”, available at: www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-pension-economics-and-finance
Chybalski, F. and Marcinkiewicz, E. (2016), “The replacement rate: an imperfect indicator of pension adequacy in cross-country analyses”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 126 No. 1, pp. 99-117.
Clingman, M., Burkhalter, K. and Chaplain, C. (2016), Replacement Rates for Hypothetical Retired Workers, Baltimore, MD, available at: www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/ran9/an2016-9.pdf
European Commission (2006), Current and Prospective Theoretical Pension Replacement Rates, Brussels, available at: www.cerp.carloalberto.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/isg_repl_rates_en1.pdf
Farrar, D.E. (1962), The Investment Decision under Uncertainty, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Goodin, R.E., Headey, B., Muffels, R. and Dirven, H.J. (1999), The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gordon, H.R. (1982), “Social security and labor supply incentives”, NBER Working Series, National Bureau of Economic Research. MA.
Gordon, S.M. (1988), Social Security Policies in Industrial Countries: A Comparative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S. (1989), “Portfolio performance evaluation: old issues and new insights”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 393-421.
Gruber, J. and Wise, D.A. (1999), Social Security and Retirement Programs around the World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Henricksson, R. (1984), “Market timing and mutual fund performance: an empirical investigation”, Journal of Business, Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 73-96.
Holzmann, R. (1988), Reforming Public Pensions, OECD, Paris.
Holzmann, R. and Guven, U. (2009), “Adequacy of retirement income after pension reforms in central”, Eastern and Southern Europe: Eight Country Studies, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Hurd, M.D. and Rohweder, S. (2008), “The adequacy of economic resources in retirement”, Working Paper WP 2008-184, University of Michigan Retirement Research Center, Ann Arbor, MI, available at: http://mrrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/briefs/pdf/rb184.pdf
International Labour Organization (1999), “Decent work”, Paper presented at the International Labour Conference 87th Session, Geneva.
Irwin, F. and Vickers, D. (1965), “Portfolio selection and investment performance”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 391-415.
Irwin, F., Blume, M. and Crockett, J. (1970), Mutual Funds and Other Institutional Investors, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Jensen, M. (1968), “The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-64”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 389-416.
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O.S. (2011), “Financial literacy and retirement planning in the United States”, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 509-525.
Mains, N.E. (1977), “Risk, the pricing of Capital assets, and the evaluation of investment portfolios: comments”, The Journal of Business, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 371-384.
Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority (2010), “Approaches to measurement of different retirement costs”, available at: www.mpfa.org.hk/tch/information_centre/publications/research_reports/files/Approaches_to_Measurement_of_Retirement_Costs.pdf
Mitchell, O.S. and Phillips, J.W.R. (2006), “Social security replacement rates for alternative earnings benchmarks”, MRRC Working Paper WP 2006-116. University of Michigan. MI.
Pang, G. and Warshawsky, M.J. (2013), “Retirement savings adequacy of US workers”, Benefits Quarterly, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 29-38.
Pierson, P. (1999), “Coping with permanent austerity: the politics of welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies”, in Pierson, P. (Ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 410-456.
Pieters, D. (1998), Social Security: Introduction to the Basic Principles, 2 ed., Kluwer Law International.
Rosen, H.S. and Gayer, T. (2008), Public Finance, 8th ed., McGraw-Hill/Irwin, PA.
Ruiz Estrada, M.A. (2007), “Econographicology”, International Journal of Economic Research, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 93-104.
Ruiz Estrada, M.A. (2011), “Policy modeling: definition, classification and evaluation”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 523-536.
Ruiz Estrada, M.A. and Yap, S.F. (2013), “The origins and evolution of policy modeling”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 170-182.
Sharpe, W.F. (1966), “Mutual fund performance”, The Journal of Business, Vol. 39 No. S1, pp. 119-138.
Treynor, J.L. (1965), “How to rate management of investment funds”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 63-75.
Veit-Wilson, J. (1992), “Muddle or mendacity? The Beveridge committee and the poverty line”, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 269-301.
Walker, L.R. (2005), Social Security and Welfare: Concepts and Comparisons, Open University Press, Berkshire.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
