Analysing the impact of a business intelligence system and new conceptualizations of system use


  • Rolando Gonzales Tecnologías de Informaci!on e Investigaci!on Operativa, Universidad ESAN, Lima, Peru
  • Jonathan Wareham Information Technology, ESADE Business School - Campus Sant Cugat, Sant Cugat del Valles, Spain


DeLone and McLean model, Seddon model, System use construct, Impact of a business intelligence system


Purpose. In this study, three models were empirically compared, the DeLone and McLean model, the Seddon model and the Modified Seddon model, by measuring the impact of a business intelligence system (BIS) in companies in Peru. After that, the mediators and dependent constructs were analysed to determine if they were behaving properly (a good level of variance explanation and significant relations with others constructs). The study used a sample of 104 users of the BIS, from companies in several important economic sectors, in a quasi-voluntary context and with six constructs: information quality, system quality, service quality, system dependence (system use), user satisfaction and perceived usefulness (individual impact).

Design/methodology/approach. To interpret the results, the authors used structural equations. The idea was to look for the best fit and explanations for the outcomes. The main difference in these models is that the DeLone and McLean model considers system dependence (system use) as a part of information system success, but in the Seddon model, it is a consequence of it.

Findings. The Seddon model seems to show the best fit and explanation for the outcomes. After that, a review of the system use construct was realised, because of its limited variance explained and the few significant relations with other constructs, to improve its explanation power in future research. Research limitations/implications – It is estimated that the sample includes more than 15 per cent of all the companies that use a BISs in Peru, so the size of the sample is adequate, but it is not entirely random and therefore limits the generalizability of outcomes. Besides that, a sample size that is bigger could be better for the sake of making a more detailed analysis, permitting the use of some items with less power, or the use of another statistical procedure for structural equations such as the Asymptotical Distribution Free, permitting a more detailed analysis (Hair et al., 2006).

Originality/value. Business intelligence (BI), one of the most important components of information systems (IS), is playing a very relevant role in business in this time of high competition, high amounts of data and new technology. Currently, companies feel pressured to respond quickly to change and complicated conditions in the market, needing to make the correct tactical, operational and strategic decisions (Chugh and Grandhi, 2013). BI is one of the most important drivers of the decade (Gartner, 2013). Big companies of IS are creating special units specialised in BI, helping companies become more efficient and effective in daily operations.



Download data is not yet available.


Baroudi, J., Olson, M. and Ives, B. (1986), “An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction”, Communications of the Acm, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 232-238.

Bokhari, R.H. (2005), “The relationship between system usage and user satisfaction: a Meta-analysis”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 211-234.

Brown, I. and Jayakody, R. (2009), “Business e-commerce success: a test validation of a revised conceptual model”, The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 129-148.

Burton-Jones, A. and Straub, D.W. (2006), “Reconceptualising system use: an approach and empirical test”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 228-246.

Byrne, B.M. (2006), Structural Equation Modeling with EQS, Psychology Press, New York, NY.

Chen, H., Chiang, R. and Storey, V. (2012), “Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 1165-1188.

Chen, L., Soliman, K.S., Mao, E. and Frolick, M.N. (2000), “Measuring user satisfaction with data warehouses: an exploratory study”, Information and Management, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 103-110.

Chugh, R. and Grandhi, S. (2013), “Why business intelligence? Significance of business intelligence tools and integrating BI governance with corporate governance”, International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 1-14, available at:

D´Ambra, J. and Rice, R.E. (2000), “Emerging factors in user evaluating of the world wide web”, Information and Management, Vol. 1904, pp. 1-12, available at:

DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992), “Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 60-95.

DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (2003), “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 9-30.

Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1998), “Assessing the software maintenance tool utilization using task-technology fit and fitness-for-use models”, Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 151-179.

Eom, S., Ashill, N.J., Arbaugh, J.B. and Stapleton, J.L. (2012), “The role of information technology in e-learning system success”, Human Systems Management, Vol. 31 No. 3/4, pp. 147-163.

Gartner (2013), “Gartner executive program survey of more than 2,000 CIOs shows digital technologies are top priorities in 2013”, available at: (accessed 7 June 2016).

Gelderman, M. (1998), “The relationship between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance”, Information and Management, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 11-18.

Gonzales, R. (2008), Modelos Para Medir el Impacto de Los Sistemas de Información, Unpublished manuscript, ESAN University.

Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. (1995), “Task-technology fit and individual performance”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 213-236.

Guimaraes, T. and Igbaria, M. (1997), “Client/server system success: exploring the human side”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 851-876.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

Halawi, L.A., McCarthy, R.V. and Aronson, J.E. (2007-2008), “An empirical investigation of knowledge management systems´ success”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 121-135.

Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994), “Explaining the role of user participation in information system use”, Management Science, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 440-465.

He, J. and King, W.R. (2008), “The role of user participation in information systems development: implications for a Meta-analysis”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 301-331.

Hennington, A., Janz, B., Amis, J. and Nichols, E. (2009), “Information systems and healthcare xxxii: understanding the multidimensionality of information systems use: a study of nurses´ use of mandated electronic medical record system”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 25 No. 25, pp. 243-262.

Hong, S., Katerattanakul, P., Hong, S. and Cao, Q. (2006), “Usage and perceived impact of data warehouses: a study in Korean financial companies”, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 297-315.

Iivari, J. (2005), “An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success”, ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 8-27.

Kulkarny, U., Ravindran, S. and Freeze, R. (2006), “Knowledge management success model: theoretical development and empirical validation”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 309-347.

Lallmahomed, M.Z.I., Rahim, N.Z.A., Ibrahim, R. and Rahman, A.A. (2013), “Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: acceptance in hedonic volitional context (facebook)”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 2776-2787.

Lucas, H.C. (1978), “Empirical evidence for a descriptive model of implementation”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 27-42.

Lucas, H.C. and Spitler, V.K. (1999), “Technology and performance: a field study of broker workstations”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 291-311.

McKinney, V., Yoon, K. and Zahedi, F. (2002), “The measure of web-customer satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 296-315.

Norzaidi, M.D., Salwani, M.I., Chong, S.C. and Rafidah, K. (2008), “A study of intranet usage and resistance in Malaysia´s port industry”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 37-47.

Parzinger, M.J. and Frolick, M.N. (2001), “Creating competitive advantage through data warehousing”, Information Strategy: The Executive’s Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 10-15.

Petter, S., DeLone, W. and McLean, E. (2008), “Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measure, and interrelationships”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 236-263.

Petter, S. and McLean, E.R. (2009), “A Meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: an examination of IS success at the individual level”, Information and Management, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 159-166.

Rai, A., Lang, S.S. and Walker, R.B. (2002), “Assessing the validity of IS success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 50-69.

Roldan, J.L. and Millan, A.L. (2000), “Analysis of the information systems success dimensions interdependence: aan adaptation of the DeLone and McLean´s model of the spanish EIS field”, BITWorld 2000, Conference Proceedings.

Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A. and Chowa, C. (2006), “Information system success: individual and organizational determinants”, Management Science, Vol. 52 No. 12, pp. 1849-1864.

Seddon, P.B. (1997), “A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 240-253.

Sharda, R., Delen, D. and Turban, E. (2014), Business Intelligence, a Managerial Perspective, Pearson, Boston.

Soh, C. and Markus, M.L. (1995), “How it creates business value: a process theory synthesis”, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of International Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Swanson, B.E. (1974), “Management information systems: appreciation and involvement”, Management Science, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 178-188.

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Maruping, L.M. and Bala, H. (2008), “Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 483-502.

Wieder, B., Ossimitz, M.-L. and Chamoni, P. (2012), “The impact of business intelligence tools on performance: a user satisfaction paradox?”, International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 7-32.

Yuthas, K. and Young, S.T. (1998), “Materials matters: assessing the effectiveness of materials management IS”, Information and Management, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 115-124.




How to Cite

Gonzales, R. ., & Wareham, J. . (2019). Analysing the impact of a business intelligence system and new conceptualizations of system use. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 24(48), 345–368. Retrieved from