¿Y si vamos a arbitraje? El arreglo interino multipartes de arbitraje: análisis y vacíos legales

Autores/as

  • Jorge Luis Manrique de Lara Seminario Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46631/Giuristi.2022.v3n5.08

Palabras clave:

Organización Mundial del Comercio, arbitraje, solución de diferencias, Órgano de Apelación

Resumen

En diciembre del año 2019 expiró el periodo de trabajo de dos miembros del Órgano de Apelación, el que, de esta forma, se convirtió en una institución inoperativa. En este contexto, un conjunto de Miembros de la OMC decidió negociar un mecanismo alternativo para resolver sus diferencias de manera definitiva: «El Arreglo Interino Multipartes de Arbitraje». Este artículo tiene por finalidad analizar el funcionamiento de este instrumento, evidenciar algunos asuntos no resueltos y explicar que la reforma del sistema de solución de diferencias de la OMC es parte de un problema mayor vinculado a la necesidad de reformar esta misma organización internacional.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Jorge Luis Manrique de Lara Seminario, Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo, Perú

Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, magíster en Estudios Avanzados en Derecho Internacional y Economía por el World Trade Institute (Suiza). Analista legal en el Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo del Perú (Mincetur) y profesor en la Universidad Privada de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) y en la Universidad Científica del Sur (UCS).

Citas

Trade Policy Agenda and 2017 Annual Report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program. Washington D. C.: Office of the United States Trade Representative, 2018.

Anuradha, R. V. «Atmanirbharta and WTO: India needs to look at larger picture». Financial Express, 19 de mayo de 2020. https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/atmanirbharta-and-wto-india-needs-to-look-at-larger-picture/1963301/Appellate Body Annual Report for 2016, WT/AB/27 (2017).

Appellate Body Annual Report for 2017, WT/AB/28 (2018).

Appellate Body Annual Report for 2019-2020, WT/AB/30 (2020).

Arredondo, Ricardo y Godio, Leopoldo. «La crisis del Órgano de Apelación de la Organización Mundial de Comercio». Revista da Secretaria do Tribunal Permanente de Revisão 7, n.º 13 (2019): 163-179.

Bas, Magdalena. «Reflexiones sobre la situación del Órgano de Apelación de la OMC». Revista Diplomática, 2.ª época 2, n.º 1 (2019): 21-30.

Benitah, Marc. «MPIA Arbitration: What will happen to the present AB jurisprudence?». International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 3 de mayo de 2020. https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2020/05/mpia-arbitration-what-will-be-the-fate-of-currentab-jurisprudence-.html

Borlini, Leonardo. «A crisis looming in the dark: Some remarks on the reform proposals on notifications and transparency». Questions of International Law, 31 de enero de 2020. http://www.qil-qdi.org/a-crisis-looming-in-the-dark-some-remarks-onthe-reform-proposals-on-notifications-and-transparency/

Canada: Measures governing the sale of wine. Agreed Procedures for Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU, WT/DS537/15 (2020).

Canada: Measures concerning trade in Commercial Aircraft. Agreed Procedures for Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU, WT/DS522/20 (2020).

Costa Rica: Measures concerning the importation of Fresh Avocados from Mexico. Agreed Procedures for Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU, WT/DS524/5 (2020).

De Andrade, Mariana. «Procedural innovations in the MPIA: A way to strengthen the WTO dispute settlement mechanism?». Questions of International Law, n.º 63 (2019): 121-149. http://www.qil-qdi.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/07_WTOFuture_DE-ANDRADE_FIN.pdf

Elsig, Manfred, Mark Pollack y Gregory Shaffer. «The U.S. is causing a major controversy in the World Trade Organization. Here’s what’s happening».

Washington Post, 6 de junio de 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/06/06/the-u-s-is-trying-to-block-the-reappointment-ofa-wto-judge-here-are-3-things-to-know/

Foltea, Marina. «The end of the WTO dispute settlement system?». Tradepacts, 24 de enero de 2020. https://tradepacts.com/news/the-end-of-the-wto-disputesettlement-system/

Hillman, Jennifer. Three approaches to fixing the World Trade Organization’s Appellate Body: The good, the bad and the ugly? Washington D. C.: Institute of International Economic Law Georgetown University Law Center, 2018.

India: Measures Concerning Sugar and Sugarcane. Panel Report, WT/DS579/R, WT/DS580/R, WT/DS581/R (2021).

Indonesia: Safeguard on certain Iron or Steel Products. Understanding between Indonesia and Viet Nam regarding procedures under Articles 21 and 22 of the DSU, WT/DS496/14 (2019).

Law.com. Obiter dicta. https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1362

McDougall, Robert. Crisis in the WTO Restoring the WTO Dispute Settlement Function. Centre for International Governance Innovation Papers Series, n.º 194 (2018). https://www.cigionline.org/publications/crisis-wto-restoring-dispute-settlementfunction

Miles, Tom. «World trade’s top court close to breakdown as U.S. blocks another judge». Reuters, 26 de septiembre de 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/ususa-trade-wto-judge-idUSKCN1M621Y

Rathore, Aditya y Ashutosh Bajpai. (2020). The WTO Appellate Body Crisis: How We Got Here and What Lies Ahead? Jurist. https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2020/04/rathore-bajpai-wto-appellate-body-crisis/

Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Amending Regulation (EU) n.º 654/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the exercise of the Union’s rights for the application and enforcement of international trade rules, COM (2019) 623 final 2019/0273 (COD) (2019).

Resignation of Appellate Body Member Communication from the Appellate Body, WT/DSB/73 (2017).

Sarvarian, Arman y Filippo Fontanelli, F. (2016). «The USA and Re-Appointment at the WTO: A ‘Legitimacy Crisis’?». EJIL:Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 27 de mayo de 2016. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-usa-and-re-appointmentat-the-wto-a-legitimacy-crisis/

Soave, Tommaso. (2020). «European Legal Culture and WTO Dispute Settlement: Thirty Years of Socio-Legal Transplants from Brussels to Geneva». The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 19, n.º 1. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3580689

Statement on a Mechanism for Developing, Documenting and Sharing Practices and Procedures in the Conduct of WTO Disputes. Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU (MPIA), JOB/DSB/1/Add.12 (2020).

Statement on a Mechanism for Developing, Documenting and Sharing Practices and Procedures in the Conduct of WTO Disputes. Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU (MPIA), JOB/DSB/1/Add.12/Suppl.1 (2020).

Statement on a Mechanism for Developing, Documenting and Sharing Practices and Procedures in the Conduct of WTO Disputes. Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU (MPIA), JOB/DSB/1/Add.12/Suppl.2 (2020).

Statement on a Mechanism for Developing, Documenting and Sharing Practices and Procedures in the Conduct of WTO Disputes. Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU (MPIA), JOB/DSB/1/Add.12/Suppl.3 (2020).

Statement on a Mechanism for Developing, Documenting and Sharing Practices and Procedures in the Conduct of WTO Disputes. Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU (MPIA), JOB/DSB/1/Add.12/Suppl.6 (2020).

Statement on a Mechanism for Developing, Documenting and Sharing Practices and Procedures in the Conduct of WTO Disputes. Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU (MPIA), JOB/DSB/1/Add.12/Suppl.4 (2020).

Statement on a Mechanism for Developing, Documenting and Sharing Practices and Procedures in the Conduct of WTO Disputes. Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU (MPIA), JOB/DSB/1/Add.12/Suppl.5 (2020).

Statement on a Mechanism for Developing, Documenting and Sharing Practices and Procedures in the Conduct of WTO Disputes. Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement Pursuant to Article 25 of the DSU (MPIA), JOB/DSB/1/Add.12/Suppl.7 (2021).

Tirkey, Aarshi y Shiny Pradeep. «The WTO Crisis: Exploring Interim Solutions for India’s Trade Disputes». Observer Research Foundation Occasional Paper, n.º 274 (septiembre de 2020). https://www.orfonline.org/research/the-wto-crisisexploring-interim-solutions-for-indias-trade-disputes/

«Global Trade after the Failure of the Doha Round». The New York Times, 1 de enero de 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/01/opinion/global-trade-after-thefailure-of-the-doha-round.html

Kawase, Tsuyoshi. «The WTO’s Appellate Body Crisis and Roles to Be Played by Japan». Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, 23 de junio de 2020. https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/special/policy-update/084.html

United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Korea. Understanding between The Republic of Korea and The United States regarding Procedures under Articles 21 and 22 of the DSU, WT/DS488/16 (2020)

U.S. Mission to International Organizations in Geneva. Statements by the United States at the Meeting of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body. Geneva, November 22, 2019. https://geneva.usmission.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/290/Nov22.DSB_.Stmt_.asdeliv.fin_.public.pdf

U.S. Mission to International Organizations in Geneva. Statement as Delivered by Ambassador Dennis Shea WTO General Council Meeting, December 9, 2019. https://geneva.usmission.gov/2019/12/09/ambassador-shea-statement-at-the-wtogeneral-council-meeting/

U.S. Mission to International Organizations in Geneva. Statements by the United States at the Meeting of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body. Geneva, June 29, 2020. https://geneva.usmission.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/290/Jun29.DSB_.Stmt_.asdeliv.fin_.public13218.pdf

World Trade Organization. Appellate Body Members. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/ab_members_descrp_e.htm

World Trade Organization. COVID-19 and world trade. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/covid19_e/covid19_e.htm

World Trade Organization. Dispute settlement activity — some figures. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispustats_e.htm

World Trade Organization. Dispute Settlement without recourse to Panels and the Appellate Body. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/disp_settlement_cbt_e/c8s2p1_e.htm

World Trade Organization. Farewell speech of Appellate Body member Peter van den Bossche. 28 de mayo de 2019. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/farwellspeech_peter_van_den_bossche_e.htm

World Trade Organization. Historic development of the WTO dispute settlement system. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/disp_settlement_cbt_e/c2s1p1_e.htm

World Trade Organization. Members review safeguard actions, address increased use of measures.

https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news21_e/safe_25oct21_e.htm

World Trade Organization. Members urge continued engagement on resolving Appellate Body issues. (18 de diciembre de 2019). https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news19_e/dsb_18dec19_e.htm

World Trade Organization. Minutes of Meeting. Held in the Centre William Rappard on 27 August 2018, WT/DSB/M/417 (30 de noviembre de 2018).

World Trade Organization. Panels established to review Indian tech tariffs, Colombian duties on fries. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/dsb_29jun20_e.htm

World Trade Organization. Regional Trade Agreements Database. https://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicMaintainRTAHome.aspx

World Trade Organization. Trade facilitation. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tradfa_e/tradfa_e.htm

World Trade Organization. World Trade Report 2021. Economic resilience and trade. Ginebra: WTO Publications, 2021.

Zelicovich, Julieta. «La crisis de la OMC y el trilema de las negociaciones comerciales internacionales». Relaciones Internacionales 92, n.º 1 (2019), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.15359/ri.92-1.1

Descargas

Publicado

2022-06-23

Cómo citar

Manrique de Lara Seminario, J. L. (2022). ¿Y si vamos a arbitraje? El arreglo interino multipartes de arbitraje: análisis y vacíos legales. Giuristi: Revista De Derecho Corporativo, 3(5), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.46631/Giuristi.2022.v3n5.08

Número

Sección

Artículos