Regulatory entanglement. A look at the aerial cable removal regulation from a regulatory quality approach

Authors

  • Karina Montes Tapia Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46631/Giuristi.2024.v5n9.03

Keywords:

regulatory impact analysis, regulatory quality, ex post evaluation

Abstract

The abundant presence of overhead wires entangled in poles in Lima, many of them in a state of deterioration and some abandoned for no apparent purpose, generate both aesthetic and public safety concerns. The recent Regulation of Law 31595, approved on March 12, 2024, seeks to address this problem by establishing the necessary regulations for their removal. This regulation was submitted to the rigorous process of regulatory impact analysis, so it is expected to be a good regulatory design, with a clear strategy to ensure its effectiveness in solving this visible problem. In this article we will review compliance with the regulatory quality process in accordance with the current legal framework, as well as the results derived from its application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Karina Montes Tapia, Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Perú

Economist from Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Master in Public Management from ESAN University. Academic interest in regulatory and public policy issues.

References

Baldwin, Robert, Martin Cave y Martin Lodge. «Cost-Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Impact Assessment». Understanding regulation: theory, strategy and practice, 315-337.Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Blanc, Florentin, Donald Macrae y Giuseppa Ottimofiore. Understanding and addressing the Risk Regulation Reflex. Dutch Risk and Responsability Programme, 2015.

Cáceres, Armando. Manual de Aplicación ACB y ACE para la presentación o evaluación de proyectos de Ley. Lima: Consorcio de Investigación Económica y Social, 2017.

Department for Business and Trade. Better Regulation Framework: Guidance. Londres: Department for Business & Trade, 2023.

European Commission. Better Regulation Guidelines. Bruselas: European Commission, 2021.

Farias, Pedro, Richard Alcorn, Daniel Trnka, Manuel Flores, Delia Rodrigo, Eliezer Olivares y Ana María Zárate Moreno. ¿Preparados para regular? Lecciones y desafíos de la regulación en América Latina y el Caribe. Washington D.C.: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004329

Johns, Melissa y Valentina Saltane. «Citizen Engagement in Rulemaking. Evidence on Regulatory Practices in 185 Countries». Policy Research Working Paper 7840. World Bank Group, 2016.

Ministerio de Transportes y Comunicaciones (MTC). «Dictamen final de la Comisión Multisectorial de Calidad Regulatoria». PDF. 9 de febrero de 2024. https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/6058321/5366827-dictamen-final_pdschatarreo-vf.pdf?v=1710512070

Ministerio de Transportes y Telecomunicaciones (MTC). «Agenda temprana». PDF. s.f. https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/4082796/Anexo. pdf?v=1675218907

Ministerio de Transportes y Telecomunicaciones (MTC). «Anexo 6. Formato para la presentación de resultados del análisis de impacto regulatorio ex ante (Informe AIR)». PDF. 31 de enero de 2023. https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/6058309/5366827-1-informe-air-ex-ante-pds-cableado-aereo.pdf?v=1710457935

Montes Tapia, Karina y Luis Ferney Moreno Castillo. Mejora regulatoria. Análisis de impacto normativo. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2021.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Política Regulatoria en el Perú: uniendo el marco para la calidad regulatoria. Revisiones de la OCDE sobre reforma regulatoria. París: Éditions OECD, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264279001-es

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Regulatory Impact Assessment. OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2021. París: OECD Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/38b0fdb1-en

Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros. Manual para la aplicación del Análisis de Impacto Regulatorio Ex Ante. Lima: Secretaría de Gestión Pública de la Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros, 2021.

Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros. Consulta pública en el marco del Análisis de Impacto Regulatorio (AIR). Lima: Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros, 2021. https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/2057612/GUIA%20CONSULTA%20PUBLICA.pdf.pdf?v=1628009570

Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros. Manual del Evaluador del AIR Ex Ante. Lima: Secretaría de Gestión Pública, Subsecretaría de simplificación y análisis regulatorio, Comisión Multisectorial de Calidad Regulatoria, 2022.

Radaelli, Claudio. CEPA strategy guidance note on Regulatory Impact Assessment. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2021.

Renda, Andrea, Lorna Schrefler, Giacomo Luchetta y Roberto Zavatta. Assesing the costs and benefits of regulation. Bruselas: European Commission, Secretariat General, 2013.

Salusso, Marco Emilio. Regulación ambiental: Los bosques nativos. Una visión económica. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Belgrano, 2008. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16662/

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Montes Tapia, K. (2024). Regulatory entanglement. A look at the aerial cable removal regulation from a regulatory quality approach . Giuristi: Revista De Derecho Corporativo, 5(9), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.46631/Giuristi.2024.v5n9.03