Investment Arbitration Versus Uncitral Arbitration: An Analysis From The Procedural Perspective

Authors

  • Tomás J. Aliste Santos Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46631/Giuristi.2024.v5n10.08

Keywords:

Investments, business corporations, arbitration, states, dispute

Abstract

Abstract. For more than sixty years, international investment law has become an extraordinary way to generate legal security in the economic development of an increasingly global world. In this sense, investment treaties have contributed through the incorporation of ISDS clauses to offer a framework for the resolution of investment disputes between international business corporations and the various States, which offers guarantees of neutrality and procedural security in the management of the conflict. In this article, we offer a critical analysis of investment arbitration. Based on the comparative analysis, we see notable differences between UNCITRAL arbitration and investment arbitration, pointing out some problems with the current investment arbitration model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Aliste Santos, T. J. (2024). Investment Arbitration Versus Uncitral Arbitration: An Analysis From The Procedural Perspective. Giuristi: Revista De Derecho Corporativo, 5(10), 142–171. https://doi.org/10.46631/Giuristi.2024.v5n10.08